State v. Howard Jones(073827)
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the CourtJustice LaVECCHIA
In determining the reliability of evidence obtained through a suggestive showup identification procedure, extrinsic evidence of guilt should play no role in the determination of the evidence’s admissibility. An analysis that considers evidence of guilt is no substitute for a proper assessment of the reliability of an identification; for purposes of complying with constitutional due process requirements, a reliability assessment must restrict its focus to the accuracy and trustworthiness of the specific identification. Today we join those federal and state jurisdictions that have expressly so…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. HendersonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. Deshawn P. Wilson(076609)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2017
- State v. ForchionNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2017
- Christopher Brandon Baines v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2023
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. BENJAMIN CAPERS (09-04-0384 AND 09-04-0385, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2017
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. EDWARD FORCHION A/K/A NJ WEEDMAN(17-02-0105, MERCER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)(RECORD IMPOUNDED)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.