Legal Opinion
State v. Forchion
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided September 13, 2017No. Docket No. A-0161-17T6PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GILSON, J.A.D.
*476Defendant Edward Forchion has been detained in jail since early March 2017, in accordance with the Criminal Justice Reform Act (CJRA), N.J.S.A. 2A:162-15 to -26. He contends that the time for his trial under the speedy trial provisions of the CJRA is about to be reached. On leave granted, he appeals three orders that found a total of sixty-seven days of "excludable time," N.J.S.A. 2A:162-22(a), under the CJRA. We hold that our standard of review of the period to "be excluded in computing the time in which a case shall be indicted or tried" under N.J.S.A. 2A:162-22(b) is de novo.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Henderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hohn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. Wesley WillieCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. NovakCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. WashingtonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. ANTOINE WILLIAMS (18-02-0353 AND 18-02-0354, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. ANTOINE WILLIAMS AND DANIQUE SIMPSON (18-02-0353, 18-02-0354, 18-06-0923, 18-02-0346, 18-02-0352, 19-04-0700, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020
- State v. JohnsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2017