Legal Opinion

(PS) Zhai v. Markstein Beverage Company

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 31, 2020No. 2:19-cv-01980Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANN ZHAI, No. 2:19-cv-1980 JAM DB PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 MARKSTEIN BEVERAGE COMPANY, et al., 15 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff Ann Zhai proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the 19 undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending 20 before the court are plaintiff’s complaint and motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 21 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF Nos. 1 & 2.) Therein, plaintiff complains about being injured in a traffic 22…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API