Legal Opinion
Auer v. Dyson
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 8, 1984PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
John R. Tenney, J.
Plaintiffs, Senator Martin S. Auer and Lawrence Sloane, have brought a motion to enforce a prior judgment of this court from a declaratory judgment action. (Auer v Dyson, 110 Misc 2d 943.) That action addressed the validity of two Power Authority of the State of New York (PASNY) bond resolutions which pledged all PASNY revenues from all of its projects. Plaintiffs contended that such a pledge violated sections 1001 and 1005 of the Public Authorities Law which require that hydroelectric power be distributed to rural and domestic customers at the lowest…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dale Renting Corp. v. BardNew York Supreme Court · 1963
- Auer v. DysonNew York Supreme Court · 1981
- Berlitz Publications, Inc. v. BerlitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
3Cited by5 opinions
- Niagara County v. Power AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Occidental Chemical Corp. v. Power AuthorityDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1992
- Korn v. GulottaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- S.P.Q.R. Co., Inc. v. United Rockland Holding Co., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- NIAGARA COUNTY v. POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW, YORKAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011