Legal Opinion

United States v. William B. Stromberg

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 13, 1992No. 91-15859Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

963 F.2d 381

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

William B. STROMBERG, et al. Defendant-Appellant.

No. 91-15859.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 7, 1992.*

Decided May 13, 1992.

Before CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, BRUNETTI and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

1

MEMORANDUM**

2

William Stromberg appeals the district court's…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. United States v. Kimberly Ann HoveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  4. United States v. Dennis L. TaxacherCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. Jack Edgar BurnesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API