Moore v. Wilson
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Sherman district court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Johnston, C. J.:
The principal and controlling question in this case is whether the live-stock commissioner has authority to appoint a deputy to act for him. James B. Moore, a farmer of Sherman county, who owned ninety head of cattle, was called on by Charles W. Wilson, who assumed to act as a deputy of John B. Baker, state live-stock commissioner, and with little if any inspection decided, on August 11, *7461908, that the cattle were infected with mange and placed a quarantine upon them. He posted a quarantine notice on the premises which recited that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State ex rel. Crawford v. HastingsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
- Powell v. . TuttleNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
- Prell v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
- Holley v. County of OrangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Young v. County of BlackhawkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sodekson v. LynchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- United States v. WatasheCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
- Coffman v. FisherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
- Albright v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
- Maroulas v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.