Oldenburg v. Central Life Assurance Society
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
The admitted facts, set out in the foregoing statement, present two questions of law: (1) Is the assignment of the life insurance policies (in view of sec. 246.09 (1), Stats.) valid as against plaintiff, the named beneficiary, she not having joined in the assignment? (2) Does the fact that after the assignment of the policies the husband and wife were divorced and no disposition of the insurance made by the judgment, and no change of beneficiary being made, affect the rights of plaintiff as the named beneficiary ? The court below held the assignments valid; and so holding, did not pass upon…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kerman v. HowardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1868
- Foster v. GileWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
- Rawson v. Milwaukee Mutual Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
- Hilliard v. Wisconsin Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
- State ex rel. Board of Regents of Normal Schools v. DonaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.