Legal Opinion

United States v. Bailey

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided April 11, 1984No. CM 444552PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT

WOLD, Senior Judge:

Appellant was charged, inter alia, with possession (Specification 1 of Charge III) and distribution (Specification 2 of Charge III) of five tablets of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) at Fort Riley, Kansas, on or about 15 April 1983, and with larceny of $30.00 from the United States at Port Riley, Kansas, on or about 11 May 1983.1 Pursuant to a pretrial agreement, appellant entered pleas of guilty to the distribution and larceny specifications and a plea of not guilty to the possession specification. The trial judge accepted the guilty pleas and entered…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. United States v. VanzandtUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  3. United States v. JacobsU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982
  4. United States v. ButlerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. BaileyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API