Legal Opinion

Farmers & Merchants State Bank v. Shaffer

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 19, 1915PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Hamilton District Court. — Hon. C. G. Lee, J udge. Action at law upon a promissory note. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSalinger, J.

The defendant asserts that the note in suit was' obtained from him by the fraudulent representations of the agent of payee, and that the plaintiff was not an innocent holder of said instrument. The note was given for shares, of stock in a 'corporation known as the Stotts Signal Company, and made payable to E. S. Stotts, who was the promoter, organizer and principal manager of such company, and the alleged false representations are said to have been made by one Dodge, who .negotiated the sale in behalf of Stotts, or of the *175company. These include representations to the effect that the company…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McNight v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  2. Joy v. . DiefendorfNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. First National Bank v. BakerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
  4. Stotts v. FairfieldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  5. League v. EhmkeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Connelly v. Greenfield Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  2. Kolb v. MallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  3. Lundean v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  4. Waukee Savings Bank v. JonesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  5. Ashley & Rumelin v. BradyIdaho Supreme Court · 1925

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API