Legal Opinion

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Cozine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 4, 1906PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Reargument of an appeal ,by Howard Cozine from a decree .of the Surrogate’s Court of the county of Kings, entered' in said Surrogate’s Court on. the--16th day of May, 1904, "judicially settling the account, of James J. Cozine, as administrator, etc., of Cornelius Cozine, deceased, except that, part thereof awarding costs to the appellant to be paid by the said James J. Cozine, individually;

1Opinion of the Court

Hirschberg, P. J.:

This appeal has been reargued by order of the court. (See Matter of Cozine, 108 App. Div. 354.) "On the original hearing we modified the decree by striking out certain items which had been paid for taxes, and affirmed the decree as thus modified. (See Matter of Cozine, 104 App. Div. 182.) The principal error then alleged by the appellant related to the reception of evidence given by the administrator involving personal transactions between himself and the intestate. We held that this evidence was chargeable to tlie scope and form of inquiries addressed by the appellant’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re HumfrevilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  2. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of CozineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re GrayNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  2. In re the Accounting of LookerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1957
  3. In re CozineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API