Legal Opinion

In re Gray

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided October 14, 1936PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

The issue in this proceeding is simple and concerns the right of the administratrix, who is a daughter of the decedent, to a solution of her claim for payments of money to and for the decedent.

Although her account purports to have allowed and paid this claim, no action on her part could produce this result, since section 212 of the Surrogate’s Court Act provides that “ an executor or administrator shall not satisfy his own debt or claim out of the property of the deceased until proved to and allowed by the surrogate ” (Matter of Gentry, 139 Misc. 759, 772), and in its…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gillet v. . Bank of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. Nay v. . CurleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Beals v. . the Home Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1867
  4. In re the Estate of WeltonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
  5. Moore v. MooreNew York Court of Appeals · 1860

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fish v. FishMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. In re the Estate of RubinsteinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
  3. In re the Estate of JohnsonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API