Legal Opinion

Wall v. AL ZEEB

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1967No. 8388PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TEIGEN, Chief Justice.

The plaintiffs, husband and wife, by this action seek to recover compensatory and exemplary damages for alleged assault and battery upon the plaintiff Eugene R. Wall by the defendant Al Zeeb, a police officer. After a verdict and judgment for the plaintiffs, the defendant Al Zeeb moved for a new trial on the grounds which fall into two major groups — errors of law occurring at the trial and excessive damages appearing to have been given under the influence of passion and prejudice. The trial court denied the motion for a new trial, whereupon the defendants Zeeb and the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. Stoy Decker and Robert Matthew CoxCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
  2. Lake v. NeubauerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Village of Barboursville Ex Rel. Bates v. TaylorWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Foster v. DwireNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Teegarden v. DahlNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Edson v. City of AnaheimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Edson v. City of AnaheimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Schumann v. McGinnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  4. Commonwealth v. SampsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  5. Howell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API