Legal Opinion
Snisky v. Pugh
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 19, 1997No. Civil Action 3:CV-97-0358PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CONABOY, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is the Petitioner’s motion for habeas corpus (Doc. 1) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The Petitioner alleges that he is entitled to a reduction in his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3621(e)(2)(B) because of his successful completion of a 500 hour Comprehensive Drug Treatment Program at the Federal Correctional Institution at McKean. For the reasons set forth infra, we shall deny the petitioner’s motion.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The Petitioner is currently serving a one hundred twenty-one (121) month term of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Lyons, James v. U.S. Marshals Carlson, Norman, Director UnknownCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Bruce Downey v. Joseph Crabtree, Warden, Federal Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Victor M. Roussos v. Frederick Menifee, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Zuliken S. Royce v. John E. Hahn, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Ferrante v. U.S. Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Joseph G. Snisky v. Michael v. Pugh, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- KORNHAUSER v. ORTIZDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- Royce v. HahnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.