Legal Opinion

The United States of America v. Farris Walker

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 10, 1957No. 11975PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINNEGAN, Circuit Judge.

After a pre-trial hearing on defendant Farris Walker’s motion to suppress (Fed. R.Crim.P. Rule 41, 18 U.S.C.) physical evidence taken from his person, the motion was overruled because, the trial judge thought Treasury enforcement agent D. Spillane had “reasonable ground” to believe Walker was committing a crime. That ruling is the sole basis put forward for reversal of the judgment entered upon finding Walker guilty by the district judge, sitting without a jury, on both counts of a two-count indictment. 1

Walker testified in support of his motion, grounded on U. S.…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Duncan v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  4. United States v. Ruth SmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  5. Ruth Johnson Williams and Fred Cook, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API