Legal Opinion
Sylcox v. Dearden
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided April 22, 1954PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
30 N.J. Super. 325 (1954)
104 A.2d 717
MARY E. SYLCOX, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT,
v.
WILLIAM J. DEARDEN, DIRECTOR OF DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES IN THE DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY, AND THE DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES IN THE DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued April 5, 1954.
Decided April 22, 1954.
Before Judges EASTWOOD, JAYNE and CLAPP.
Mr. Peter Friedman argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Mackerley and Friedman, attorneys).
Mr. James T. Kirk, Deputy Attorney-General, argued the cause for respondents (Mr. Grover C.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- State v. LabatoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- State v. Di GiosiaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- State v. ShoopmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- Kocses v. MageeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1944
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. HoagNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- State v. ZaltaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
- Cresse v. ParsekianNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963