Legal Opinion
State v. Zalta
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 22, 1987PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
217 N.J. Super. 209 (1987)
525 A.2d 328
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
RALPH ZALTA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued December 10, 1986.
Decided January 22, 1987.
Before Judges KING and HAVEY.
Fred Ira Eckhaus argued the cause for appellant (Widman & Cooney, attorneys; Fred Ira Eckhaus on the brief).
Mark P. Stalford, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (John A. Kaye, Monmouth County Prosecutor, attorney; Mark P. Stalford of counsel and on the brief).
The opinion of the court was delivered by HAVEY, J.A.D.
Defendant was found…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. CameronSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- State v. LeeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- State v. MatulewiczSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- State v. MartorelliNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- State v. KalafatNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. McDonaldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
- State of New Jersey v. Idris R. PerryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2015
- State v. PitcherNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
- Villanueva v. ZimmerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013
- State of New Jersey v. Robert LuzhakNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.