Legal Opinion
United States v. Akers
District Court, E.D. California
Decided January 8, 1987No. Civ. S-84-1276 RARPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
RAMIREZ, District Judge.
On July 21, 1986, the cross-motions of plaintiff United States of America and defendant Robert W. Akers for partial summary judgment came on regularly for hearing, the Honorable Raul A. Ramirez presiding. Assistant United States Attorney Karen L. Patterson appeared for the plaintiff. Lanny T. Winberry appeared for defendant Robert W. Akers. James S. Bur-ling and Fred A. Slimp, II, Pacific Legal Foundation, appeared on behalf of the defendant…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. CiampittiDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1984
- Track 12, Inc. v. District Engineer, US Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1985
3Cited by7 opinions
- Leslie Salt Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Abenaki Nation of Mississquoi v. HughesDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1992
- United States v. Southern Investment Company, Southern Investment Company, Cross-Appellee v. United States of America, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- Leslie Salt Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1989
- Golden Gate Audubon Society, Inc. v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.