Legal Opinion

State v. Taylor

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided August 11, 1992No. 91-2736PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMyse, J.

The state appeals a judgment imposing civil penalties against Craig Taylor, who was convicted of operating after revocation, fifth offense, as a habitual traffic offender. The state contends that once a person is classified as a habitual traffic offender under ch. 351, Stats., any subsequent convictions for operating a motor vehicle are criminal offenses. The state argues that when a person is classified as a habitual traffic offender, that person's driving privileges are not revoked "solely due to a failure to pay a fine or forfeiture"; therefore, sec. 343.44(2) (e)2, Stats., does not apply.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wood v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. Hoa Duc PhamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. EichmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Schlosser v. Allis-Chalmers Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  5. City of Ralston v. BalkaNebraska Supreme Court · 1995

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Elliott v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
  2. State v. BiljanCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
  3. State v. KniessCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API