Legal Opinion
United States v. Eisenberg
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided April 12, 1990No. Crim. 89-218PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LECHNER, District Judge.
On 22 March 1990 I filed an Opinion (the “Recusal Opinion”) denying the motions by Richard O. Bertoli (“Bertoli”) and Richard S. Cannistraro (“Cannistraro”) for my recusal (the “Recusal Motions”). .734 F.Supp. 1137. On 2 April 1990 counsel to Bertoli, Franklin M. Sachs, Esq. (“Sachs”), filed a Motion for Reargument and Reconsideration (the “Reconsideration Motion”). 1 In support of that motion, Sachs filed an affidavit, dated 2 April 1990 (the “2 April 1990 Sachs Aff.”), and a letter-memorandum, dated 2 April 1990 (the “2 April 1990 Letter-Memorandum”). On 5…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. Thomas A. DalfonsoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- United States v. EisenbergDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1990
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Richard O. BertoliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- United States v. BertoliDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
- United States v. EisenbergDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1991
- United States v. CannistraroDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
- United States v. BertoliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.