Faringer v. Ramsay
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the court of chancery. The hills in these cases were filed originally on the equity side of Baltimore county court, the one on the 2nd and the other on the 3rd of July 1849. The causes were afterwards removed to the court of chancery and consolidated by the chancellor.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the court of chancery. The hills in these cases were filed originally on the equity side of Baltimore county court, the one on the 2nd and the other on the 3rd of July 1849. The causes were afterwards removed to the court of chancery and consolidated by the chancellor. The bill in the first case alleges, that on the •—• day of — 1849, Jacob Faringer applied for the benefit of the insolvent laws, and that on the 11th of June 1849, he in the meantime having died, Catharine Faringer, his widow, the complainant, became his permanent trustee. That she was married to him in 1829, and…
1Opinion of the CourtLk Grand, C. J.
These suits, which were consolidated by the order of the chancellor, have for their object a decree, declaring certain property mentioned in the proceedings to be part of the insolvent estate of Jacob Faringer.
The bills were filed by his widow as permanent trustee. They claim the properly as part of his insolvent estate. It is true, they also say, that the deeds which are attempted to be *374set aside as fraudulent, were made as well in fraud of the marital rights of the widow as those of the creditors, but they were filed by her, not as widow, but as permanent trustee of her husband, under his…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Ringo v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
- Dixon v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
- Hollida v. ShoopCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1853
- Glenn v. GroverCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1852
- Greer v. BaughmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1859
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.