Legal Opinion

Dorrance v. Zoning Board of Appeal of North Attleborough

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided June 6, 1979PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff brought suit to review the grant of a variance by the zoning board of appeal of North Attleborough, and his action was dismissed for failure to comply with the procedural requirements of G. L. c. 40A, § 21 (reference is to the "old” zoning enabling act, as amended through St. 1974, c. 78, § 1, prior to amendment by St. 1975, c. 808, § 3), specifically, failing to file on time with the town clerk a written notice of the commencement of his action in the Superior Court, together with a copy of his complaint. See Pierce v. Board of Appeals of Carver, 369 Mass. 804, 808 (1976);…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Superintendent of Worcester State Hospital v. HagbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  2. Pierce v. Board of Appeals of CarverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  3. Costello v. Board of Appeals of LexingtonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975
  4. Vyskocil v. VyskocilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  5. Reiter Oldsmobile, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1978

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Points East, Inc. v. City CouncilMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  2. Krupp v. Gulf Oil Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1990
  3. Hawkins v. HawkinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  4. Doten v. DotenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  5. Tammaro v. ColarussoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API