Legal Opinion
Lee v. ætna Casualty & Surety Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 19, 1949PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RYAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff and defendant move for summary judgment under Rule 56, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.
The complaint asserts two claims: In the first, plaintiff seeks to recover $5,000 and $334.76 costs with interest thereon, under a policy of liability insurance issued by defendant to Trefflich Pet Shop, Inc. (hereafter the insured). This claim is based on the provisions of Section 167, subd. 1(b) of the New York Insurance Law, Consol.Laws, c. 28. In the second claim, plaintiff seeks to recover for the expenses alleged to have been incurred by the insured in the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Coleman v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Bird v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Goldberg v. Lumber Mutual Casualty InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Grand Union Co. v. General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- Grand Union Co. v. General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Lee v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Stidham v. Millvale Sportsmen's ClubSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Aragona v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- C. Raymond Davis & Sons, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
- Alm v. Hartford Fire Insurance CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 1962
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.