Michael Josef Brodheim v. James K. Rowland, Director, California Department of Corrections Ron Koenig
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
The district court ruled California’s statutory scheme for providing work credits to convicted murderers violates the equal protection clause. Brodheim v. Rowland, 783 F.Supp. 1245 (N.D.Cal.1991). The court’s interpretation of California law was expressly repudiated by In re Singer, 13 Cal.App.4th 1755, 17 Cal.Rptr.2d 395 (6th Dist.1993). “We are bound by that state court’s construction of its own penal statute,” McSherry v. Block, 880 F.2d 1049, 1052 (9th Cir.1989), and may re-examine a state court’s interpretation of its own law only if “the court’s interpretation is untenable or amounts to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Olim v. WakinekonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Joseph Toussaint, Plaintiffs/appellees/cross-Appellants v. Daniel McCarthy Defendants/appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Ward v. Board of Commr's of Love Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Gary James Taylor v. Lawrence KincheloeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Leonard James McSherry v. Sherman Block, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. JenkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Ferreira v. BorjaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Ferreira v. BorjaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Morgan v. RobinsonDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2001
- Terry A. Messer v. J. NunezDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2026