Legal Opinion

Soileau v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 18, 1966No. 1595PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TATE, Judge.

This appeal arises in the following statutory context: Automobile liability insurers issuing policies for Louisiana motor vehicles are required by statute to provide uninsured motorist coverage, unless “any insured named in the policy shall reject the coverage”. LSA-R.S. 22:1406, subd. D(l), as amended in 1962. Ify this coverage, the persons protected by the policy are insured for personal injuries for which owners and operators of any ««insured motor vehicles are liable arising out of the ownership or operation of the ««insured vehicle; in effect, insofar as those insured by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Adams v. Manchester Insurance & Indemnity CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  2. International Union of Operating Engineers v. Guy Scroggins, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Dungan v. Utica Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Oncale v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
  2. Ridgway v. Shelter Insurance CompaniesCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1996
  3. Rushing v. Protective National Ins. Co. of OmahaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. Progressive Specialty Insurance Co. v. GoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  5. Progressive Specialty Insurance Co. v. GoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API