Lee v. DeBardeleben Coal & Iron Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from the City Court of Birmingham. Tried before the Hon. W. W. Wilkerson. All the facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion. cited Cobb v. Malone, 92 Ala. 630.
1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.
The appellant, Lee, recovered a judgment against the appellee, which judgment, upon motion of the appellee, was set aside, and a new trial granted. The present appeal is prosecuted from the order of the court granting a new trial. The cause of action was to recover for personal injuries averred to have been sustained by reason of the negligence of the defendant, and was brought under the employer’s liability act. The complaint contains three counts. The defendant pleaded the general issue, and also contributory negligence, to the whole complaint. To the defendant’s plea of contributory…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Highland Avenue & Belt Railroad v. DusenberrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
- Birmingham Mineral Railroad v. JacobsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Louisville & Nashvile Railroad v. HurtSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MothershedSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ray v. Fidelity-Phoenix Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Burnett Bean v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. TownsendSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1901
- Karter v. PeckSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
- Hightower v. OgletreeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.