Legal Opinion

Prina v. Board of Supervisors

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1914No. Civil No. 1429PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Graham. A. G. McAlister, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs commenced this action, praying for a writ of mandamus compelling the appellees, as members of the board of supervisors of Graham county, to re-establish the boundaries of election precinct No. 1 of said county so as to include therein only the territory covered by the corporate limits of the incorporated town of Safford, and exclude all territory lying outside of such corporate limits included in said precinct No. 1 as now defined. Plaintiffs alleged reasons and grounds for such change in the boundaries of said precinct: First. That two proposed laws have been initiated to be voted…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bayard v. United States Ex Rel. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Osborn v. ClarkArizona Supreme Court · 1881
  3. In re WoffendenArizona Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Board of Barber Examiners v. WalkerArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  2. State v. PhelpsArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District Number One v. La PradeArizona Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Industrial Com. of Arizona v. PriceArizona Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Ackerman v. HoustonArizona Supreme Court · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API