Legal Opinion

Pecaravich v. Gilmore

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided May 4, 1918No. 155-KAPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JENNINGS, District Judge.

The purchaser at an execution sale moves for confirmation of sale. Koel has filed objections to the confirmation of the sale, alleging (1) that the execution was issued at a date more than five years after the judgment, which judgment had never been revived; (2) that he (Koel) is in possession of the property, and is the successor in interest of a purchaser under foreclosure sale of a “second” mortgage given by judgment debtor; (3) that even he (Koel) holds subject to a prior “first” mortgage.

At common law no confirmation of a sale on a legal execution was necessary,…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Queen of the North, Inc. v. LeGrueAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Sullens & Hoss, Inc. v. RobertsDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1954
  3. Sullens & Hoss, Inc. v. RobertsDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API