Sullens & Hoss, Inc. v. Roberts
District Court, D. Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
FOLTA, District Judge.
11 Alleging that they are the lawful owners of property sold upon execution in the above entitled case, Heckel, Richardson, and Luthman have moved that the sale be vacated. The plaintiff has countered with a motion to strike, on the ground that the movants are strangers to the suit and that the interposition of the motion is an unwarranted intrusion.
It appears that on March 30, 1953, the property involved was sold under a writ of execution; that a part thereof had previously been conveyed to Luthman by warranty deed recorded November 3, 1952, and that Heckel and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pecaravich v. GilmoreDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1918
- Plant v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943