Haebler v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Per curiam
The sole question involved in this case is whether under the Revenue Act of 1926 a claim for an estate tax refund otherwise established is limited in amount to the portion of the tax paid within three years of the presentation of the claim. The defense made to plaintiff’s case is that under the law and the regulations of the Department it is so limited.
We are not disposed to enter into any further discussion of this question. In Hills v. United States, 50 F.(2d) 302, 55 F.(2d) 1001, 73 Ct. Cl. 128 (submitted on demurrer), in an exhaustive opinion upon hearing and rehearing, this court held…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hills v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931
- Hills v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932
- Union Trust Co. of Rochester v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- United States v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1934
- Hills v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1934
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tait v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co. of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
- Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1935