Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Jung

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided March 28, 2011No. 2010-1019PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINN, Circuit Judge.

Edward K.Y. Jung and Lowell L. Wood, Jr. (collectively, “Jung”) appeal the decision of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (“Board”) sustaining the invalidity of all but five claims of U.S. Patent Application No. 10/770,072 (“'072 application”) for anticipation or obviousness. Ex parte Jung, No. 2008-3711, 2008 WL 4974150 (B.P.A.I. Nov. 21, 2008) (“Decision”), reconsideration denied, Ex parte Jung, No.2008-003711, 2009 WL 1995983 (B.P.A.I. July 7, 2009) (“Reconsideration”). Because the examiner properly established a prima facie case of invalidity, and because…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re Frank N. Piasecki and Donald N. MeyersCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  2. In Re Hans OetikerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  3. In Re Anthony J. Robertson and Charles L. ScrippsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  4. In Re Sujeet KumarCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  5. Arthur W. Chester, Albert B. Schwartz and William A. Stover v. Stephen J. Miller and Keith C. BishopCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Rambus Inc. v. ReaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
  2. In Re Magnum Oil Tools International, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  3. Inre: PackardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
  4. In Re Antor Media Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
  5. Honeywell International Inc. v. Mexichem Amanco Holding S.A. De C.V.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API