Legal Opinion
(PC) Hill v. Whitworth
District Court, E.D. California
Decided August 18, 2020No. 2:20-cv-00905Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 CYMEYON HILL, No. 2:20-cv-0905-JAM-EFB P 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. ORDER 13 STEVE WHITWORTH, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff, a civil detainee, proceeds without counsel in this action brought pursuant to 42 17 U.S.C. § 1983. He has filed an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. 18 Application for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis 19 Plaintiff’s declaration makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. 20 § 1915(a). Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. Because…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Johnson v. DuffyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Kenneth O. Ashelman v. Hon. Gary Pope, Judge Division I, Mohave County Superior Court Mohave County Attorney's OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.