Moore v. Moore
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge Cammack
Affirming in part, reversing in part.
Roy Moore instituted this action in the latter part of August, 1944, to obtain a divorce from his wife, Flossie Moore, and to have the child born to Mrs. Moore on August 6, 1944, adjudged not to be his. In her answer and counterclaim Mrs. Moore sought to have Roy’s petition dismissed, and to obtain alimony for the support of herself and her child. The trial resulted in the granting of an absolute divorce to Roy and the refusal of any allowance for the support of Mrs. Moore and the child. It was further adjudged that the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ratliff v. RatliffCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lanford v. LanfordSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
- Silke v. SilkeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
- J.A.S. v. BushelmanKentucky Supreme Court · 2011
- Gross v. GrossCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1953
- Bradshaw v. BradshawCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.