Legal Opinion

HASTINGS BY HASTINGS v. Hastings

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 18, 1960Published

1Opinion of the Court

33 N.J. 247 (1960)

163 A.2d 147

MARY ELIZABETH HASTINGS, BY AGNITA HASTINGS, HER GUARDIAN AD LITEM, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

EDMUND HASTINGS, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued May 9, 1960.

Decided July 18, 1960.

Mr. Sam Weiss argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant (Messrs. Eisenstein and Eisenstein, attorneys; Mr. Weiss, of counsel).

Mr. Gustave A. Peduto argued the cause for defendant-respondent (Mr. Charles A. Rooney, attorney; Mr. Peduto on the brief).

The opinion of the court was delivered by HALL, J.

This appeal presents the single clear-cut question whether an…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  2. Hewlett v. GeorgeMississippi Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Collopy v. Newark Eye and Ear InfirmarySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  4. Dunlap v. DunlapSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1930
  5. Smith v. BrennanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API