Legal Opinion

Ellick v. Perez

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 6, 2001No. 00-6333PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Michael Darryl Ellick, a pro se federal prisoner, appeals a district court order dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).

Ellick filed this habeas corpus petition alleging that the United States Parole Commission violated his due process rights when the Commission automatically relied on a state drug conviction to forfeit his “street…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. James Charles, (98-5747), Movant (98-0539) v. Ernest v. Chandler, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  2. Sam Richard Kell v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  3. Hackett v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  4. Charles Curtis Harris v. Irl Day, Warden United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
  5. Joel Munguia v. U.S. Parole Commission, Tom KindtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Crane v. Warden, Madison Correctional InstitutionDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2025
  2. Stubbs 398621 v. WilsonDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2024
  3. Woodard 650305 v. KingDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API