Legal Opinion
Riccardi v. United States Department of Justice
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 27, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2012-1887PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Ketanji Brown Jackson, United States District Judge
Proceeding pro se, plaintiff James Riecardi has filed this action to challenge the adequacy of the search for records that the Executive Office for United States Attorneys (“EOUSA”) conducted in response to a Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) request that Riecardi submitted. (Compl., ECF No. 1.) 1 In addition to claiming that “Defendants have wrongfully withheld the requested records,” (Compl. ¶ 27), Riccardi’s complaint also faults the EOUSA for denying his plea for expedited processing of his FOIA request. (Compl. ¶¶ 29…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Valencia-Lucena v. United States Coast GuardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- Defenders of Wildlife v. United States Border PatrolDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- GUILLERMO FELIPE DUEÑAS ITURRALDE v. COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCYCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- The Founding Church of Scientology of Washington, D. C., Inc. v. National Security AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
- Fielding M. McGehee III v. Central Intelligence AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dibacco v. U.S. Department of the ArmyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Navigators Insurance v. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2016
- In re American Civil Liberties Union Freedom of Information ActUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2017
- Leopold v. Central Intelligence AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026