State v. Johnson
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.
Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for unlawful possession of a destructive device, ORS 166.382. That statute defines the crime of unlawful possession of a destructive device to include possession of “[a]ny of the following devices with an explosive, incendiary or poison gas component: * * * [b]omb.” ORS 166.382(l)(a)(A). Defendant assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal, asserting that there was insufficient evidence that the blasting cap that he possessed was a “bomb” under that statute. We conclude that the evidence was sufficient to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. CunninghamOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. LuersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- State v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004