Legal Opinion

St. Louis, Kansas City & Colorado Railroad v. Lewright

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 31, 1893PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error to St. Louis Circuit Court. — Hon. W. W. Edwards, Judge. (1) This being a summary proceeding under tbe statute for appropriation of private property for public use, every matter necessary to confer jurisdiction must appear on tbe face of tbe proceedings.

Read the full summary

Error to St. Louis Circuit Court. — Hon. W. W. Edwards, Judge. (1) This being a summary proceeding under tbe statute for appropriation of private property for public use, every matter necessary to confer jurisdiction must appear on tbe face of tbe proceedings. Railroad v. Young, 96 Mo. 39, and cases cited; Railroad v. Camp-hell, 62 Mo. 585; Railroad v. Carter, 85 Mo. 448; Mills on Eminent Domain, sec. 115; Railroad v. Story, 96 Mo. 611; Cory v. Railroad, 100 Mo. 282. (2) In sucb a, proceeding tbe circuit court bas no powers except sucb as are expressly given by statute. Gray v. Railroad, 81…

1Opinion of the CourtBuegess, J.

This is a proceeding commenced by the defendants in error in the circuit court of Franklin county against the plaintiff in error for condemnation of a right of way through certain lands of plaintiff in error described in the petition. Inasmuch as a point is made by plaintiff in error on the sufficiency of the petition we here set it out in full, omitting parts not here material:

“St. Louis, Kansas City & Colorado Railroad Company, of the State of Kansas, plaintiffs, v. “William P. Lewright, James M. Lewright, Elijah McLean, and- I. B. Kitchen, defendants.
“The plaintiff states that it is a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bateson v. ClarkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1865
  2. Kansas City, St. Joseph & Council Bluffs R. R. v. Campbell, Nelson & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  3. Kansas City, Clinton & Springfield Railroad v. StorySupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
  4. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. YoungSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
  5. Kansas City, Clinton & Springfield Railway Co. v. CarlisleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. May Department Stores Co. v. HaidSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  2. St. Louis, Keokuk & Northwestern Railroad v. Knapp-Stout & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  3. Lilly v. MenkeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  4. Southern Illinois & Missouri Bridge Co. v. StoneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
  5. Roden v. HelmSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API