Legal Opinion

Zarzana v. Ashley

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided January 23, 2007No. 14-06-00100-CVPublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LESLIE BROCK YATES, Justice.

In four issues, appellant Sam Zarzana appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of appellees Donald Ashley and Charles Ashley d/b/a Meineke Car Care # 10 on his claims of negligence, fraud, violation of the Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act, and civil conspiracy. We affirm.

I. Factual and Procedural Background

On March 5, 2003, Sam Zarzana went to Meineke Car Care # 10 (“Meineke”) in Houston, Texas, co-owned and operated by Donald Ashley, to replace the muffler and exhaust pipe on his truck. Ashley typically managed the…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. King Ranch, Inc. v. ChapmanTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  3. McConnell v. Southside Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  4. KPMG Peat Marwick v. Harrison County Housing Finance Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Joe v. Two Thirty Nine Joint VentureTexas Supreme Court · 2004

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. In Re Enron Corp. Securities, Derivative & Erisa Lit.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2011
  2. Sonic Systems International, Inc. v. Croix, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
  3. Fink v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  4. American Zurich Insurance Company as Subrogee of the Varsity Golf Club, LTD D/B/A the University of Texas Golf Club v. Barker Roofing, L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2012
  5. Elbar Invs., Inc. v. Okedokun (In re Okedokun)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2018

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API