Legal Opinion

Higginbotham v. International-Great Northern R.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 2, 1936No. 4658PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, Justice.

This suit was instituted by the appellants, Clarence Higginbotham and his wife, against the appellees as trustees and receivers of the International-Great Northern Railway Company.

The appellants claim damages for personal injuries that each received at a crossing on the track of the Railway Company by a collision of their automobile with a freight train which they claim was negligently operated by appellees.

The- case was submitted to the jury on 43 special issues, a number of which are immaterial to this appeal, but the findings on certain issues, the substance of which we…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. GrayTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Pecos & Northern Texas Railway Co. v. CoxTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Barron v. Houston E. & W. T. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  4. Casstevens v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Bradshaw v. AbramsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fort Worth & Denver City Ry. Co. v. BozemanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  2. McBeth v. Texas & Pacific Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  3. Craghead v. United Transports, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API