Legal Opinion

S. D. Moody & Co. v. Spotorno

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 6, 1904No. 14,928PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans; Walter Byers Sommerville, Judge. Action by S. D. Moody & Co., Limited, against Louis Spotorno. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtProvosty, J.

This is a suit for the recovery of the defendant’s share in the cost of the construction of a sidewalk along the street on which his property fronts, in accordance with a contract made by the plaintiff to that effect with the city of New Orleans.

The first defense is that the amount is sought to be recovered of the defendant as a tax upon his property, and that the tax is unconstitutional because the defendant’s property received no benefit from the improvement; in fact, that the 'amount demanded exceeds the amount of the property. This court is now thoroughly committed to the doctrine that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chadwick v. KelleySupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Kelly v. ChadwickSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1900
  3. State v. Rosenstream, Weiss & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1900

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. City of Shreveport v. ChatwinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
  2. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. City of Winter HavenSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  3. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co. v. OttSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
  4. Monongahela River Consol. Coal & Coke Co. v. Board of AssessorsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1905
  5. Town of Minden v. GlassSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API