Legal Opinion
Covinsky v. Hannah Marine Corp.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided February 17, 2009No. 1-08-0695, 1-08-0779 consPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE KARNEZIS
delivered the opinion of the court:
Plaintiff Jeffrey Covinsky (Covinsky) was employed by defendant Hannah Marine Corporation (Hannah Marine). When Hannah Marine refused to pay him pursuant to a golden parachute provision in his employment contract, Covinsky filed a two-count action against Hannah Marine and its owner, defendant Donald C. Hannah (Hannah), asserting breach of contract against Hannah Marine and violation of the Illinois Wage Payment and Collection Act (820 ILCS 115/1 et seq. (West 2006)) (Wage Act or the Act) against Hannah and Hannah Marine. The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Duldulao v. Saint Mary of Nazareth Hospital CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
- Ziemba v. MierzwaIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
- Mohanty v. St. John Heart Clinic, S.C.Illinois Supreme Court · 2006
- Golden Rule Insurance v. SchwartzIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
- Neppl v. MurphyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Pence v. GEE Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Bernstein & Grazian, P.C. v. Grazian & Volpe, P.C.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2010
- Timan v. OuradaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
- Doornbos Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. v. SchlenkerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
- Majmudar v. House of Spices (India), Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2014
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.