Legal Opinion
United States v. Richard A. Heidecke, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 1, 1990No. 88-1749, 88-2178PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARLINGTON WOOD, Jr., Circuit Judge.
A federal jury found Richard A. Hei-decke, Jr. guilty of attempted extortion in violation of the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951(a), (b)(2). The court sentenced Hei-decke to six months of unsupervised probation. Heidecke appeals from an interlocutory order denying his motion to dismiss on the basis of double jeopardy and from the judgment of the district court finding him guilty of attempted extortion.
We have jurisdiction to hear Heidecke’s interlocutory appeal under the principles of 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and Abney v. United States, 431 U.S. 651, 97 S.Ct. 2034, 52…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Wayte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Marshall v. LonbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- United States v. Elizabeth Sanders James SandersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- United States v. William J. BensonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- United States v. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Bernard J. Morgano, Dominick Palermo, Nicholas Guzzino, Peter Petros, Sam Nuzzo, Jr. And Samuel GloriosoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Lance Henry Wilson, United States of America v. Leonard E. Briscoe, Sr., United States of America v. Maurice David SteierCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.