Legal Opinion

Dowty v. Pittwood

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1899No. 1408PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from District Cowrt, Cascade County; J. B. Leslie, Judge. Contest of an election by David Dowty against William H. Pittwood. Prom a judgment in favor of contestant, the contestee appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hunt

Pittwood ran against Dowty for alderman of the first ward of the city of Great Palls at a city election held April 3, 1899. Pittwood was thereafter declared elected. Dowty then brought this action, under section 2010 et seq. of the Code of Civil Procedure, to contest Pittwood’s election, upon the ground that Pitwood was ineligible, for the reason that he had not been a resident of the ward for one year preceding his election. Pittwood moved to strike this allegation from Dowty’s statement, but the motion was denied. Judgment was thereafter entered in favor of respondent, Dowty, and annulling…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jobb v. County of MeagherMontana Supreme Court · 1898
  2. State ex rel. Aachen & Munich Fire Insurance v. RotwittMontana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Steele v. GilpatrickMontana Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Proctor v. Cascade CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Esgar v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1919
  2. McDonald v. Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  3. Coolidge v. MeagherMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  4. People ex rel. Davis v. Wabash RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Phelps v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API