Bond v. Bourk

delivered the.opinion of the court:

In substance the complaint alleges that on or about March ioth, 1908, plaintiff Bourk entered into an oral agreement with defendant Bond, to manufacture and deliver to the latter a soda water fountain of' certain dimension's and particular design, to be manufactured by A. H. and F. H. Eippincott, of- Philadelphia, except the marble counter' and *52base and the superstructure- and wooden base, which were to be made by the Eureka Marble Works and J. P. Paulsen, respectively, Denver firms, all in accordance -with certain specifications furnished by the…