Legal Opinion

United States v. Quashie

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided February 17, 2016No. 14-CR-376 (BMC)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED ORDER1

BRIAN M. COGAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Defendant’s pending motions are disposed of as follows:

Photo Array

1. Defendant moves to suppress his identification from a photo array by one of the victims of his crime. He contends that under the totality of the circumstances, both the photo array and line-up were unduly suggestive and improper, and therefore should be suppressed.

2. I held an evidentiary hearing in this matter. At this hearing, the Government called two witnesses, Detective Brockman, and Mr. Salazar, a victim of the July 10, 2009, robbery.

3. Detective Brockman…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  4. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Riley v. Cal. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. Prentiss Anthony CrumbleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
  2. United States v. Oniel McKenzieCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
  3. United States v. ClarkeDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2016
  4. United States v. DervishajDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2016
  5. Cesar Martinez v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API