Legal Opinion

State v. Thomas

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 2002No. 1999-1511PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.

{¶ 1} In this appeal, defendant-appellant, William A. Thomas, raises fifteen propositions of law. Finding none meritorious, we affirm his convictions. We *310have independently weighed the aggravating circumstances against the mitigating factors and compared his sentence with those imposed in similar cases, as R.C. 2929.05(A) requires. As a result, we affirm defendant’s convictions and sentence of death.

{¶ 2} Defendant broke into Florence “Molly” Newbirt’s home in Toledo, Ohio, during the early morning of November 23, 1994. The defendant robbed and murdered 87-year-old Newbirt by repeatedly…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. State v. LottOhio Supreme Court · 1990

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. State v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. KettererOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. FrazierOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. ElmoreOhio Supreme Court · 2006

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API