Legal Opinion

Peacock v. Sheffield

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 31, 1967No. 42445PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Quillian, Judge.

At the close of the evidence, counsel for the defendant moved for a directed verdict in the following language which we quote in part: “At this time I would like to move for a directed verdict on behalf of the defendant in the proposition under the law that the evidence clearly shows that whatever negligence the defendant may have been guilty of, if any, was a static condition, and the evidence clearly shows that the plaintiff through the exercise of ordinary care could have seen him or should have seen him and avoided the consequences of any negligence that the defendant may…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Malcom v. MalcolmCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. StaffordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  3. Wright v. Trust Company of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  4. McDowall Transport Inc. v. GaultCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  5. Johns v. SecressCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. C & S REALTY CO.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  2. REVCO DISCOUNT DRUG CENTRES OF GEORGIA, INC. v. FambleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  3. Clements v. LongCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  4. McClurd v. ReddickCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  5. Tucker v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API