Legal Opinion
Wright v. Trust Company of Georgia
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided December 5, 1963No. 40381, 40412PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Russell, Judge.
A motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict should be made in accordance with the grounds of the antecedent motion for a directed verdict. Grigsby v. Fleming, 96 Ga. App. 664 (101 SE2d 217); Durden v. Henderson, 212 Ga. 807 (96 SE2d 362); Sunbrand Supply Co. v. Garment Finishing Equipment Corp., 99 Ga. App. 72 (107 SE2d 680). One of the grounds of the motion for a directed verdict was that the plaintiff (who had elected to proceed in tort) offered no evidence of the commission of a tort by the defendant. The motion for judgment n.o.v. contained the grounds that the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Williams v. HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- Lummus Cotton Gin Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Holland v. Mutual Fertilizer Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
- One in All Corp. v. Fulton National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- McIntire v. RaskinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Rezapolvi v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- Able & Associates, Inc. v. Orchard Hill FarmsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- Pennsylvania v. Curtiss National Bank of Miami SpringsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Wilmington Trust Company v. Delaware Auto SalesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1970
- Banco Ganadero y Agricola, S.A. v. Society National Bank of ClevelandDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1976
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.