Legal Opinion

Roe v. Doe

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided December 31, 1996No. 22737PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANSING, Judge.

This is an action for termination of the parental rights of the natural father of a young child. As a consequence of certain discovery violations by the natural father, the court imposed sanctions under I.R.C.P. 37(b) and (d) which precluded the natural father from presenting at trial his exhibits and the testimony of several of his witnesses. After a judgment adverse to the natural father was rendered by the magistrate, an appeal challenging the discovery sanctions was taken to the district court. The district court reversed and ordered a new trial. On further appeal to this…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Lehr v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Caban v. MohammedSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. State v. HedgerIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Ireland v. IrelandIdaho Supreme Court · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. AndersonIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Noble v. Ada County Elections BoardIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. Justin Lee WilsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Milburn v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Dodd v. JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 2025

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API