Legal Opinion

Morrill's Admx. v. Catholic Order of Foresters

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 19, 1907PublishedCited by 5 opinions

General Assumpsit on a certificate oí life insurance, brought under No-. 121, Acts 1896. Heard on demurrer to the declaration at the March Term, 1906, Orleans County, Watson, J., presiding. Demurrer overruled, pro forma, and declaration adjudged sufficient. The defendant appealed. The certificate in question recited that the‘“Catholic Order of Foresters hereby promises and binds itself to pay” $1,000 to- the beneficiaries therein named.

Read the full summary

General Assumpsit on a certificate oí life insurance, brought under No-. 121, Acts 1896. Heard on demurrer to the declaration at the March Term, 1906, Orleans County, Watson, J., presiding. Demurrer overruled, pro forma, and declaration adjudged sufficient. The defendant appealed. The certificate in question recited that the‘“Catholic Order of Foresters hereby promises and binds itself to pay” $1,000 to- the beneficiaries therein named. The seal affixed to the certificate is a. legal seal. 25 Am. & Eng. Enc. of Law, 73, 80; Beardsley v. Knight, 4 Vt. 471; Bank v. Sldson, 13 Vt. 334; Bates v.…

1Opinion of the CourtTyler, J.

This action was brought in general assumpsit based upon an endowment certificate or policy of life insurance, issued by the defendant to Peter Morrill and payable to *483his sons, Peter and Joseph Morrill, upon proof of his death and of his compliance with the conditions named in the certificate. The defendant craved oyer of the certificate, which was granted, and it then demurred to the declaration. The case is here upon exception to the overruling of the demurrer.

The action was brought under No. 121, Acts of 1896, the first section of which reads:

“In actions brought to recover on a fire, life…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jacksonville, Mayport, Pablo Railway & Navigation Co. v. HooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. President of Bank of the Metropolis v. GuttschlickSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
  3. Bank of Middlebury v. Rutland & Washington RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1858
  4. Clark v. Farmers' Woollen Manufacturing Co.New York Supreme Court · 1836
  5. Fairchild v. North-Eastern Mutual Life Ass'nSupreme Court of Vermont · 1879

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Morehouse v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  2. Jacobs v. Loyal Protective InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1924
  3. Patterson's Admr. v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1915
  4. Howard National Bank v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1923
  5. White v. HallSupreme Court of Vermont · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API